Posts First Missing Integer (InterviewBit)
Post
Cancel

First Missing Integer (InterviewBit)

PROBLEM DESCRIPTION

Given an unsorted integer array, find the first missing positive integer. Your algorithm should run in O(n) time and use constant space.

InterviewBit

SOLUTION

Let’s understand the solution with the help of an example:

A = [3 4 -1 1]

We need to first for the first positive integer which is missing in this array. This array is of size 4, so the numbers expected to be present are -> 1, 2, 3 and 4. The first number missing amongst them is our answer. It’s also possible that all 4 numbers are present, for example A = [1 2 3 4]. In that case, the first missing positive number will be 5, since that is the next +ve number not present in the array.

First, let us get rid of the -ve values. You will soon understand why we are doing this. The negatives values cannot be our answer. So we can set it to some +ve value which should cannot be the answer. It’s okay to set it to +INFINITY also. In our case, we will just set it to size_of_array+1 = 5.

So, now the array will be:

A = [3 4 5 1]

The size of the array is 4. The expected first four +ve numbers that we are looking for are: [1, 4].

The problem also expects us to not use any extra space. So, we need a way to mark a value if it’s present using the existing array itself!

Let us say, if value X is found, we will mark the index X as -ve? Well, that will mostly work, except for the last value which is 4 in this since that will be out of bounds for the array.

We can handle this in a simple way - If value X is found and it is in the valid range [1,4], we will mark the index (X-1). For example, if value 3 is found, then we will mark the index (3-1) = 2 index as -ve.

Let us do that:

A = [3 4 5 1]
i=0 -> element 3 -> yes, it’s a valid answer, so mark (3-1)=2 index as -ve
A = [3 4 -5 1]
i=1 -> element 4 -> yes, it’s a valid answer, so mark (4-1)=3 index as -ve
A = [3 4 -5 -1]
i=2 -> element 5 (absolute value) -> no, not in the valid answer range [1,4]
A = [3 4 -5 -1]
i=3 -> element 1, so mark (1-1)=0 index as -ve
A = [-3 4 -5 -1]

We have all the information to find out the missing number now!

If A[i] is -ve, that means (i+1) was found in the array before.

So, we iterate from i=0 to i=n-1 and get the first index which has a positive value (not marked). Let’s say that index is X. That means, the value X+1 was not present in the array, otherwise A[X] would have been -ve. We can return X+1 as the answer. If all values from A[0] to A[n-1] are -ve, we found all numbers in the range [1,n]. So the first missing +ve number is n+1.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
public class Solution {

    public int firstMissingPositive(int[] A) {

        int n = A.length;

        // the valid answer can be in the range [1,n]
        // if all are present, then the first missing number will be n+1
        int validStart = 1;
        int validEnd = n;

        // change -ve to out of range
        for(int i=0; i<n; i++){
            if(A[i] <= 0) A[i] = n+1;
        }

        // when a valid x is found, mark index (x-1) -ve
        // by doing this, we know that if the value at any index i is -ve, then i+1 must be present in the array
        for(int i=0; i<n; i++){

            int currentVal = Math.abs(A[i]); // the value may have been already set to -ve earlier, so take absolute first

            //check if the value is in the valid range
            if(currentVal >= validStart && currentVal <= validEnd){
                // there can be duplicates in the array, so make it -ve only if it was +ve earlier
                if(A[currentVal-1] > 0)
                    A[currentVal-1] = -A[currentVal-1];
            }

        }

        // if any of the value as a +ve value (not marked with -ve earlier), we can say that (i+1) is the first missing number
        for(int i=0; i<n; i++){
            if(A[i] > 0){
                return i+1;
            }
        }

        // all numbers from 1 to n were found, so the next missing has to be n+1;
        return n+1;

    }

}
This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.